This project seeks to strengthen
peace building by reinforcing the principles and values for peace
present in local culture, spirituality, and theology.
Activities Year 2
In 2003-2004, the project will address its second
theme, Myself & the Other, through a series of workshops in
8 countries. An International Encounter will serve to exchange experiences
and reinforce bonds and solidarity. Some of the most talented and
committed will receive specialized training as grassroots peacemakers.
Finally, outstanding participants will participate in a Peacebuilding
Institute to more deeply examine the theme of Myself & the Other
and assist in writing a manual for grassroots peacemakers.
Achievements Year 1
The Culture, Spirituality, and Theology
of Peace Project (CSTP) is really taking root. One year after its
initiation, grassroots participants in Mesoamerica have taken the
initiative to organize the project regionally, participate directly
in decision-making, facilitate the training of peacemakers, and
consolidate the peacemaking network. Thus, local participation and
enthusiasm are not only validating the project's activities to date,
they will also insure and improve the relevance of this project
to the needs of the people of Mesoamerica in their efforts to reinforce
principles and values for peace and sustainable development.
Beginning in October 2002, José
"Chencho" Alas began conducting workshops in Mesoamerica
and the United States to introduce participants to the Culture,
Spirituality, and Theology of Peace. These initiated discussion
of the theme of Earth & Ecology, and prepared participants for
participation in the January 2003 Peace Conference in Guatemala.
Workshop participants included
grassroots peace activists, non-profit staff, academics, peasants,
and clergy from eight countries. The workshops produced better results
than had been anticipated. Not only did participants see a clear
connection between their faith, spirituality, or culture with the
earth and ecology, but they were also able to associate them with
their life, work, and environment. Jewish participants presented
their religious principals of tikkun olam and seddakah, Mayas from
Guatemala shared their spirituality through experiences and rituals
associated with the earth and agriculture, and Nicaraguan participants
contributed the Miskito legend The Invisible Hunters (which was
immediately incorporated into all the workshops that followed).
Participants from many Central American countries shared their concern
that Plan Puebla-Panama and free trade agreements currently under
negotiation could have a serious and negative impact on the earth
and ecology. In every group, participants identified the need for
themselves and their own people to live more in accord with their
principles and values.
The Peace Conference in Guatemala
City gathered, united, and distilled the energy and experiences
of the workshops into a more concrete product. It represented the
collaboration of 109 diverse people, creating a South-North dialog
across the boundaries of 13 countries. Mayas, Christians, and Jews
and others contributed from a variety of different backgrounds,
including peasants, professionals, and clergy. The fruits of the
conference can be summarized as knowledge, solidarity, and responsibility.
In the experiences of organizations like Esperanza Cooperative (Panama)
and in Mayan spirituality, participants found models that would
allow them to better live and promote local values that protect
the earth and ecology. By interacting with and listening to the
diversity of voices - including peasant farmers, indigenous people,
professionals, NGO staff, and Bishop Barahona, Episcopal Primate
for Central America - participants drew strength from each other
to face challenges. Buoyed by their new knowledge and sense of solidarity,
many participants committed themselves to increase their efforts
as peacemakers and apply what they had learned to their own work
in their communities.
Immediately following the closing
ceremony, the leadership of the peasant-run network of 400 community
stores, Red COMAL, met spontaneously to discuss the results of the
conference. Trinidad Sanchez, the peasant-born Executive Director,
related that the organization intends to systematically apply principles
and values for the earth and ecology to their work and training.
The participating rabbis pledged to increase their time and financial
commitment to the project, that a rabbi will participate in all
future workshops in Mesoamerica, and they will bring representatives
from Mesoamerica to their synagogues in the United States to share
their experiences.
In June 2003, 26 outstanding project
participants from 8 countries came together for advanced training
and study at the Peace Institute in Ciudad Romero, El Salvador.
They began work by exploring and defining how people at the grassroots,
especially the poor, can do theology. Mark Chupp, a specialist from
Cleveland State University, gave a three-day workshop on using Appreciative
Inquiry. Finally, participants took 8 days to begin planning and
writing the peacemakers' manual on Earth and Ecology.
On August 8, 2003, José "Chencho"
Alas met with eight participants in Honduras. These eight had organized
the meeting, through their own initiative, to create a regional
committee to provide grassroots input into the CSTP project. During
this one-day meeting, the participants outlined a structure and
goals that will permit Mesoamerican representatives to participate
in the project decision-making process and take responsibility for
local activities. This meeting culminated in the formal creation
of the Mesoamerican Peace Committee (COMPAZ) as a permanent body.
Most significantly, participants are taking ownership of the project
and making it their own. COMPAZ developed a fourteen-month schedule
of activities. It includes 14 workshops in Mesoamerica, a schedule
for finishing the first chapter of the peacemaking manual, dates
for the next encounter (conference) and institute, and even a plan
to raise money in Europe. The responsibility for many of these activities
is now passing to local organizers rather than falling on the shoulders
of FSSCA staff. This not only indicates the degree of participants'
investment in the project; it also reduces the costs incurred by
the FSSCA in the project.